Darfur Con't

Posted by tom | Jun 2, 2005

More can be found on Darfur at the NY Times

and Village Voice, thanks for the link Jon!

Our Wednesday discussion group wrestled w/the question as to whether American Evangelicals are paying more attention to Darfur b/c those dying are said to be Christians. Whether or not those dying are followers of Christ, what Jesus would do is clear, extend His grace and care in this broken part of the world. We are His Body and are to do such, not just in Darfur but in all places of need, whether in our family, neighborhood, community of faith, or in the various other parts of the world torn by the ravages of sin & conflict. Such is our call as the ears, eyes, and hands of God in the world today. May we be a part of a rapid response team which offers help, hope, healing, and redeeming influence, even this very day.

2 Comments & 0 Trackbacks of "Darfur Con't"

    Another group (if broad stereotypes can be made based on one co-worker) that is interested in this is the anti-Bush crowd.

    We get political propaganda posted in our R&D meeting area, primarily put there by the VP, but I (and I think others) contribute occasionally. Recently, there have been a number of articles on Darfur, and 140 days of silence (the number of days since Bush mentioned it publicly).

    Posted by jondaley, Jun 3 2005, 10:17

    Yes. The Days of Silence is becoming a strong piece of the critique, that is feature of the NY Times video piece above. If you're reading these posts and haven't watched it yet, I'd recommend you take a look. Quite compelling.

    Posted by Tom, Jun 3 2005, 16:50
Add comment