The Rise of Cosmopolitan Evangelicalism

Posted by tom | May 7, 2008

Yesterday, Mapping the Evangelical Intelligentsia and Evangelicalism Rebounds in Academe went up on the Chronicle of Higher Education’s website. The first article brings to the attention of the larger academic community:

1. Two-year research project on evangelical intellectuals, primarily in the secular academy, but also as public intellectuals directed by Timothy S. Shah and Peter L. Berger through Institute on Culture, Religion and World Affairs (CURA).

2. CURA's The Opening of the Evangelical Mind Conference (December 7-8, 2007):

An increasingly sophisticated, self-assured, and productive class of intellectuals is emerging in American public life — an “evangelical intelligentsia.” These evangelicals, engaged in intellectual pursuits in a way that is motivated by and informed by their faith, are exercising a growing influence on American academics, culture, law, and public policy. This conference, under the auspices of Boston University’s Institute on Culture, Religion, and World Affairs (CURA), aims to illuminate the development, contributions, and cultural consequences of this emerging generation of American evangelical intellectuals. — taken from here

The second article is written by D. Michael Lindsay, an assistant professor of sociology at Rice University and author of Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined the American Elite (Oxford University Press, 2007). Lindsay's book is still on my to read list, recently moved up by Jim Sire's highl recommendation. The article is quite a piece, here’s the conclusion:

Nearly every evangelical scholar I encountered embodies a “cosmopolitan” evangelical faith. They are “worldly” believers, in the best sense of the term. They regularly rub shoulders with people of different faiths and of no faith at all. They aim not to “take back” the country for their faith, but simply want their faith to be seen as reasonable, genuine, and attractive. This cosmopolitan style of faith has helped evangelicals gain a seat at the table within the arts world. Evangelicals who have succeeded, such as the visual artist Makoto Fujimura — the youngest person ever named to the National Council on the Arts — don’t desire to impose their moral vision on the rest of the artistic community, but at the same time, they don’t want to exclude their faith from the work they do. The same can be said of evangelicals within the groves of academe. Their rise into the halls of power is significant, but not menacing. Cosmopolitan evangelicals will not overturn the apple cart. They want civil discourse, not a culture war.

And we can learn from them. Indeed, in our understanding of evangelicals and the evangelical movement, we could all benefit from a more cosmopolitan outlook.

Anyone want to give a stab as to their thoughts regarding Cosmopolitan Evangelicalism as a term and/or an end goal for Evangelicals?

8 Comments & 0 Trackbacks of "The Rise of Cosmopolitan Evangelicalism"

    The "Evangelical Manifesto" seems to come from a similar angle.

    http://www.anevangelicalmanifesto.com/

    Posted by Peter V, May 7 2008, 13:33

    Thank-you Peter . . . I liked what I saw on my initial skim. Printing a copy to read over and comment on later.

    Posted by Tom, May 7 2008, 17:08

    "They... want their faith to be seen as reasonable, genuine, and attractive."

    Is this their primary concern or is it ancillary to something else? If it is their primary "goal" then i bristle at the idea. If, however, it is a desire kept secondary (at best) to a faith that is "attractive" to God, then i could live with that.

    I would also want to know how these "cosmopolitan Evangelicals" determine a faith that is "reasonable, genuine and attractive. (I'm sure Dawkins, Hutchens, et al might have something to say about that.)

    Posted by Jim, May 8 2008, 16:39

    Thoughts on "An Evangelical Manifesto"

    we don't need a manifesto, but the current political scene prompted these ivy-league type christians to say they're not stupid: "don't confuse us with fundamentalists like hagee, don't assume we're dumb republicans...we're christians, yes, but we're not like those people...we're offended if you think we are"....i'm guessing that most christians at harvard will sign this manifesto, and intervarsity staff too..they're proud people...but signing this manifesto will never make it cool to be followers of Christ

    Posted by Miller, May 9 2008, 08:24

    comment on the evangelical manifesto sent to me by john frame, RTS orlando...

    There’s very little that I disagree with in this document. (The sacred/naked/civil distinction is kind of neat, but it needs more precision to give real guidance.) My main problem is that it is much too long to be a real “manifesto,” that it spends too much time belaboring the obvious. I agree with you that the real meat begins around p. 15 and that should have been stressed much more.
    As you say, its purpose seems to be to say (both to themselves and to the world) “we’re not fundamentalists.” I think we also need to point out that we are not elitists.
    As for fundamentalism, I think evangelicals need to get beyond the knee-jerk rejection of that part of our history. I admire the fundamentalists for standing firm on Scripture against all comers. While rejecting racism, literalism, dispensationalism, anti-intellectualism, etc., we need to renew that spirit in our circles. I think the book I’m working on, Doctrine of the Word of God, may be attacked as neo-fundamentalist, or some such thing.

    Posted by miller, May 12 2008, 09:55

    Any thoughts as to whether Evangelicals should embrace the Evangelical Manifesto, deficiences included, and sign it to make a stand with Evangelicalism? Or are we 'just Christ followers?' Or 'the people of God' within other narrower or broader traditions/denominations/movements.

    Posted by Tom, May 12 2008, 10:14

    John Stackhouse presents a good point of view on the Evangelical Manifesto, I think. I generally shun labels other than "Christian," but there's a lot I can identify with in the Manifesto, and I greatly appreciate its even-handed, moderate, dare I say Christ-like approach. It may sound ho-hum to some, and others may view it as a wimpy desire not to be identified with Fundamentalists, but if Christians are to have any reasonable voice in the public square we need to get out from under stereotypes and "past watchful dragons." The Evangelical Manifesto seems to me to be a reasonable effort so to do.

    Posted by SursumCorda, May 13 2008, 11:02

    Scott McKnight enters the conversation and notes his disagreement w/J.A. Smith.

    Posted by Tom Grosh, May 19 2008, 21:19
Add comment