Not surprising, I came across
Hipster Christianity on Facebook. Here's a post which exemplifies the push of a new release (8/1/2010):
This week is "Know Your Christian Hipster History" week... Throughout the week, if you re-post a FB item from Hipster Christianity (tag Hipster Christianity in your post) or tweet a link to a Hipster Christianity post (tag @brettmccracken on Twitter), you'll be entered in a drawing for a free autographed copy of the book. 5 books will be given away on Friday!
Still not convinced of and/or have the time for twitter, so hope this post places me in the running ;-)
More seriously, a few more thoughts on Hipster
Christianity: When Church and Cool Collide (Brett McCraken. Baker
Books. 2010), http://www.hipsterchristianity.com/about.php to add to What's
your Christian Hipster Quotient? Note: As with the first post, the material is an adaption of a BIC-TALK post. This post touches upon how Hipster
Christianity overlaps with fashion/looks and whether the whole thing is just a joke. As you may guess, concerns stemming from taking the quiz, http://www.hipsterchristianity.com/quiz.php ;-)
==========
Yes, in some ways Hipster
Christianity is a joke or at least a concept which deserves a ;-) Below's part of the author profile, http://www.hipsterchristianity.com/about.php, which helpfully shares the genesis of the book.
Brett [McCracken] got the idea to write about this topic after witnessing the curiosity of
"cool Christianity" firsthand through involvement with Relevant, education at a Christian college [Wheaton College], and a childhood within the evangelical Christian subculture, where he observed a gradual shift away from the "stained glass and steeples" old guard of traditional Christianity to a more unorthodox, stylized 21st-century church. This raised questions in Brett's mind: What does it mean when Christianity becomes cool or strives to be fashionable? Are there inherent contradictions in the term "hipster Christianity?"
Yes,
there are some "looks" which have become more acceptable to "cool
Christians" in Evangelical circles, e.g., http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=10278&id=112719812101235&ref=mf,
http://www.hipsterchristianity.com/anatomy.php,
but I don't think it's about 'the look' as much as 'Evangelicalism's
younger generation's' journey, attitude, issues, and questions in
relationship to the mid-to-late-20th Century/21st Century Evangelical subculture. I
think that the issues are probably different for those born-and-raised
in the Evangelical subculture versus those who entered in as 'adults'
[e.g.,
Some such as myself have a stronger critique of the larger American
culture which we left (e.g., "American Dream," "Amusing Ourselves to Death," "Consumerism," "Cultural Relativism"/Tolerance, "The End of Education," lack of "Creation Care," etc.) and don't quite 'understand' a lot of Evangelical subculture
(the pieces of 20th Century and 21st Century wider Evangelicalism with which we didn't interact with as children and have concerns regarding its purpose/direction). The point is to embrace, be
continually present in/transformed by, and share the salt, light, and
leaven of Christ to the glory of God through all of one's person as a
member of the people of God directed by the Word and Spirit of God].
In addition, I think that Evangelicalism
has more of a range than the Evangelical and popular press acknowledge
(by denomination, colleges/seminaries, geography, family).
Question: How does your local congregation/denomination currently relate to the
'Evangelical subculture' as widely understood by the Evangelical and
popular press?
As I've been rooting around the author's blog, http://stillsearching.wordpress.com/,
I found a number of posts to help frame Brett McCracken's perspective.
The Facebook page ...
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hipster-Christianity/112719812101235
;-)